- and college students about universal values -
If it is foul, and whether the public are free to debate that it is smelly? - And college students about the universal values of summer craft -
-
Teacher: -
you are in the I have two days to look at -
previous understanding of the word, basically, , we can probably guess what it is they going to refer to the content, nothing more than the Western world, especially the United States preached, a realm. So I am more recognized. Of course, in terms of criticism from some people, maybe I was Southern Weekend, -
However, I browse the Internet these days, when more is such a kind of get the message that other countries who strongly to the implementation of -
tell the truth, I am very confused. Universal value in the end it is only for people to worship and reach of myth, or just cultural expansion in some countries the implementation of the anesthetic? Universal value in the end exist? If so, how to ensure everyone will abide by it? Universal value in the end for China's contemporary society? (I know this logic faulty, since it is universal, how there will be suitable to China's problems do), Anyway, I bit messy, I found that hard for me to choose, from the rational point of view, freedom, equality, fraternity, which It is very important indeed universal standards of human acts, but from our national feelings and deep-rooted concept of the past in terms of education, but also really scared, it really is a universal value that sugar-coated bullets - one day when people scored our country, just call out, we are to implement universal values, is not, we will lay down their arms, surrender? -
for universal values, how do you think? Do you think it really exists, and is conducive to China? -
-
small C: -
busy today, too late and you go into the details. -
can only give you some ideas of my own. -
1, the relationship between state and citizens. I think this is the premise we're talking about this issue. Particular country, government, political parties and citizens, I think if you have a clearer understanding of this problem will not interfere with you too. Not like you said, puzzled, / p>
specifically how, I can not replace you think. But I can tell you that China has too many intellectuals, or scholars, and touched the country's problems to cerebral palsy, which I very much agree with a statement. -
-
2, of motivation is always worthy of attention. In particular, the state and the nation on the grounds that the motive of the first theory, conspiracy theories, is the most doubtful. Why? Motivation is a lucrative trade, less need of proof, only suspicion, but also promote other people's suspicion. Can be very easy to get things or people stigmatized. Therefore, whenever such an argument, please do alert that there really is evidence? Really process? To see their motivation, it is better to understand the real situation. -
-
3, any values. Either universal or Should be open for all to debate. Then let the people choose (in Germany, Nazi ideology is not, because it caused thousands of deaths, have been killed, resulting in human history, the biggest humanitarian disaster. Of course, this interpretation I can not say, what ideas and values, but also created such a huge humanitarian disaster? democracy, freedom, equality, has caused these before?). But back to the universal value of the dispute. You can see Sima Nan, Chang Ping, Wenfeng article, contrast, watching argument is not a free atmosphere, there is no free space for debate, there is not a fair platform. If so, then perhaps half a dozen, if not even talk about the values of the other person to be removed from the media to be purged, then you should see clearly the problem. Who is more tenable? Who, more ulterior motives. -
-
4, we often say. See a person not only depends on what he said, also look at what he did. Select samples to compare their own, those who advocate their own values, people, or groups, some of what they actually did. Who is more dirty, who is more dark, who is more selfish. -
-
5, you said I do not know, what country are you talking about? If the United States, I suggest you do two things: 1, more Chinese people's 2, read the writings of Linda and Liu Yu, seriously look into American political life. And then make your judgments. -
-
6, Have a very interesting paper, called Long live such a thing to have. -
-
7, the key is. Touch your heart. Look at yourself, are you willing to live in a Nordic Human Rights can not accept low, low welfare countries Americans can not accept not? If our country can not afford to improve the rights, how can it not make sense, we are not always known to perform strong it? If we can not improve, it only shows one, those of us who are not, we are inferior. As our ability to improve welfare, that depends on the financial state, you can see Mr. Chen Zhiwu article discusses the wealth of the Chinese government (Analysis of the interview. URL here:
you will easily find low to improve the welfare of human rights and low, in fact, not the national capacity, but the attitude. This attitude, if it is because with the Then you think about this for our long-term benefits in low and low values of human rights is really good or bad? -
As for historical reasons, the historical responsibility that can be discussed separately. -
-
values behind, is a social reality. If you think the current reality in China is perfect, you are able to accept, that I do not say anything. -
-
-
Subscribe to the reading room -
-
No comments:
Post a Comment